start here

start here

The Daily IKN email digest, get all daily posts sent to you next day (& no ads)

I say things on Twitter


Thoughts on Goldcorp (GG) (from IKN377)

One of the minor pieces in IKN377 out last night was this, a musing on a couple of aspects of Goldcorp (GG) after its rotten Q2 results last week.

Goldcorp (GG): If you care about the large cap miners you’ll already know that the negative vibes for GG we mentioned a couple of weeks ago in IKN375 turned into nasty reality on Wednesday. The company reported a stinker of a quarter so I won’t do the big details here, save to say that on a pure production basis the main hits came from production problems at Peñasquito and Cerro Negro.

One-time hits? Well yes they happen and aren’t good, but they happen to them all over time and that’s no reason to judge the new CEO negatively on that alone. GG is “under new management” and you could cut David Garofalo slack if you consider that he inherited a company badly in need of restructuring. Take for example the implicit message of “we were high grading the crap out of Peñasquito last year and it’s going to take until 2019 to repair the damage” in the NR. But there are other things that make me wonder whether this new direction for GG is going to turn out like Spinal Tap’s new direction of free-form jazz. Example one, Garofalo said (13) during the prepared notes at the Conference Call:

"While lower production was expected in the second quarter, the decision to accelerate a significant organizational restructuring had a short-term, negative impact on gold production.”

And though blandly put, that’s one helluva thing to say. It’s one thing to swallow the cash hit from a much-vaunted re-organization and in this case, CEO Garofalo’s new broom has cost U$39m in restructuring charges to date. It’s quite another to see production hit by the changes, the actual amount of gold and other things affected by the upset of staff redundancies and so forth. The whole point of corporate restructuring is to make a company more efficient, not less efficient! I honestly thought that here in the 21st century we’d moved on from the ‘beatings will continue until morale improves’ method of corporate captaincy.

The second thing that concerns me, the analyst on the outside looking in, is the decision to sell Los Filos, as well as Marlin and Alumbrera. Here’s how Garofalo put it:

"Los Filos, Marlin and Alumbrera are smaller scale mines. They don't have the economies of scale that our existing five camps offer us" or that a newly acquired gold project, Coffee, "potentially offers us once it's built out".

And here’s what it says in the quarterlies (with CODM = Garofalo):

Effective January 1, 2016, the Company's CODM reviewed the results of its mines and associate that have short mine lives and are headed for closure together as one operating segment. Accordingly, the Company has grouped Los Filos and Marlin into one operating segment, Other mines, and presented its 37.5% interest in Alumbrera as the Other associate operating segment.

So I understand the decision behind Marlin, there may be something for a smaller mining company to explore and re-define there but for the GG size of company it’s now depleted (not to mention the crappy political risk of operating in Guatemala). I also understand the Alumbrera decision, it’s also near closure and a minority stake.

But Los Filos? Really? This is a 250,000oz to 300,000oz gold per annum mine that’s very profitable (in 2q16 op. Cash cost U$704/oz, AISC U$822/oz). Those cash costs are slightly above the GG average, but both production and costs ae a darned sight better than Eleonore. It can hardly be called depleted either, with the potential to go underground on the Bermejal Deep deposit with 1.3m oz M+I plus 1.1m oz inferred (and open along strike and at depth). However, Garofalo has decided it’s up for sale and if it goes, it’s another 10% sliced off an already sharply depleted corporate production rate. Can somebody please tell this man we’re in a bull market?